Caillies, S., Denhierre, G., & Jhean-Larose, S.  (1999). The intermediate effect: Interaction between prior knowledge and text structure. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (1st ed., pp. 151-168). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2005, May). Reading and language arts requirements. Retrieved September 2, 2006 from California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/requirements.html

California Department of Education. (2006, August). Star 2006 test results. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from California Department of Education, Testing and Accountability, from http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2006/Viewreport.asp

Chamberlain, S. (2006, Jan). The state of reading research and instruction for struggling readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 169-175.

Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., & Jacobs, I.  (2001, July-August). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Interactions, 1, 34-54.

Chomsky, N. (2004). Radio interview. KPFA, 94.1. Berkeley, CA.

Chomsky, N. (2005, September). Personal Correspondence, email. Sacramento, CA.

Cote, N., & Goldman, S.  (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (1st ed., pp. 169-194). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Cowan, T. (2005, December). CRS report for Congress. California’s San Joaquin Valley: A region in transition. (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Library of Congress, Order Code RL33184.

Crane, G. (2005). In a digital world, no book is an island: Designing electronic primary sources and reference works for the humanities. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 11-26). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education (1^st ed.) New York, NY: Touchstone.

Dicks, R. S. (2002). Mis-usability: on the uses and misuses of usability testing. In K. Haramundanis, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (1st ed., pp. 26-30). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Dilley, P. (2004, Jan). Interviews and philosophy of qualitative research. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 127-132.

Dillon, A.  (1996). TIMS: A framework for the design of usable electronic text. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing (1st ed., pp. 43-75). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Dillon, A.  (2004). Designing Usable Electronic Text (2^nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Dillon, A. (2005). Conclusion: So what is this thing called information. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 145-155). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Dutoit, T.  (2001). An Introduction to Text-to-Speech Synthesis (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Dymond, S. K. (2001, Spring). A participatory action research approach to evaluating inclusive programs. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), 54-63.

Dyson, M. C.. (2005). How do we read text on screen. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 279-306). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Edwards, C., & Imrie, R.  (2003, May). Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology, 37(2), 239-256.

Egloff, T. H. (2004, January). Edutainment: A case study of interactive CD-ROM playsets. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 2(1), Article-4.

Eklundh, K. S., Groth, K., Hedman, A., Lantz, A., Rodriguez, H., & Sallnas, E. (2003). The world wide Web as a social infrastructure for knowledge-oriented work. In H. van Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a digital world (1st ed.) (pp. 97–126). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Elder, N.C., & Miller, W.L. (1995, September). Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies, Journal of Family Practice, 41(3), 279-286

Farsides, T. (2004). Cognitive mapping: Generating theories of psychological phenomena from verbal accounts and presenting them diagrammatically. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Doing Social Psychology Research (1st ed., pp. 255-288). Oxford, UK: The British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

Foley, D.E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(5), 469-490.

Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M., & Jenkins, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.

Garrod, S., & Stanford, A.  (1999). Incrementality in discourse understanding. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (1st ed., pp. 3-28). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Good, R., Simmons, D., & Kame’enui, E. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257-288.

Hammel, J., Finlayson, M., & Lastowski, S.  (2003, August). Using participatory action research to examine outcomes and effect systems change in assistive technology financing. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(2), 98-108.

Haramundanis, K.  (2001). Learnability in information design. In M. J. Northrop, & S. Tilley  (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (1st ed., pp. 7-11). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., & Goble, C. (2004, August). How much is too much in a hypertext link: Investigating context and preview – A formative evaluation. In J. Whitehead & D. De Roure (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (1^st ed., pp. 116-125). New York, NY:  ACM Press.

Hiebert, E., & Fisher, C. (2005, May). A review of the National Reading Panel’s studies on fluency: The role of text. The Elementary School Journal, 105 (5), 443-461.

Hiller, H., & DiLuzio, L. (2004). The interviewee and the research interview: Analyzing a neglected dimension in research. The Canadian Review of Sociological & Anthropology, 41(1), 1-26.

Hudson, R., Lane, H., & Pullen, P. (2005, May). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how?. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.

Hughes-Hassell, S., & Bishop K. (2004). Using focus group interviews to improve library services for youth. Teacher Librarian, 32(1), 8-12.

Jackson, S.  (2003). How interdisciplinary teams created company-wide section 508 accessibility guidelines for writers. In S. B. Jones, & D. G. Novick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (1st ed., pp. 140-142). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P.  (2003). The levels of Web-based discussions: Using perspective-taking theory as an analytical tool. In H.  van Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a Digital World (1st ed., pp. 77-96). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L. L., Sacks, G., & Jacobson, L. A. (2004, Spring). What research says about vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 70(3), 299-322.

Kame’enui, E., & Simmons, D.  (2001). Introduction to this special issue; The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 203-210.

Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., & O’Brien, B.  (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 51-82.

Kaye, H. S. (2000). Computer and internet use among people with disabilities (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education.

Keller, P., & Stevens, C.  (2004). Meaning from environmental sounds: Types of signal-referent relations and their effect on recognizing auditory icons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(1), 3-12.

Kerr, S. J., Neale, H. R., & Cobb, S. V. (2002). Virtual environments for social skills training: The importance of scaffolding in practice. In V. L. Hanson, & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), Assets 2002: The proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on assistive technologies (1st ed., pp. 104-110). New York, NY: ACM Press.

King, I. C. (2003, Spring). Examining middle school inclusion classrooms through the lens of learner-centered principles. Theory Into Practice, 42(2), 151-158.

Knudsen, E. I., & Brainard, M. S. (1991, July 5). Visual instruction of the neural map of auditory space in the developing optic tectum. Science, 253(5015), 85-88.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Ladavas, E. Di Pellegrino, G. Farne, A., & Zeloni, G. (1998, September). Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 581-590.

Lai, J., Wood, D., & Considine, M. (2000). The effect of task conditions on comprehensibility of synthetic speech. In (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI'2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1st ed., pp. 321-328). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Langston, M., & Trabasso, T.  (1999). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (1st ed., pp. 29-70). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Law, C., Jacko, J., Peterson, B., & Tobias, J. (2005, October). Panel: Universal designs versus assistive technologies: Research agendas and practical applications. In A. Sears, & J. E. Pontelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (1st ed., pp. 1-3). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Lepola, J., Poskiparta, E., Laakkonen, E., Niemi, P., & Pullen, P. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 367-399.

Lyons, L., & Chipperfield, J. (2000, Fall). (De)constructing the interview: A critique of the participatory model. Resources for Feminist Research, 28(1), 33-50.

Macaluso, E. Frith, C. D., & Driver, J. (2000, August 18). Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science, 289(5482), 1206-1213.

Mauthner, N.S., & Doucet, A. (2003), August). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413-431.

Michaels, C.A., & McDermott, J. (2003, Summer). Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: Program coordinators’ perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 29-41.

Miller, C. T., & Kaiser, C. R. (2001, Spring). A theoretical perspective on coping with stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 73-83.

Mirenda, P.  (2003, July). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203-216.

Misra, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Poldrack, R. (2004). Neural systems for rapid automatized naming in skilled readers: Unraveling the RAN-reading relationships. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 273-292.

Molich, R., & Jeffries, R.  (2003). Comparative expert reviews. In G. Cockton, & R. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings from the 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1st ed., pp. 1060-1061). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Moloney, M. F., Dietrich, A. S., Strickland, O., & Myerburg, S.  (2003, October-December). Using internet discussion boards as virtual focus groups. Advances in Nursing Science, 26(4), 274-286.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Morton, K., & Tatham, M. (1996). Natural voice output in interactive information systems. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 18(1), 1-6.

Moustakas, C. E. (1990). Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology, and Applications (1st ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc..

Nielsen, J.  (1994). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. Retrieved June 2, 2003, http://www.useit.com/papers/guerrilla_hci.html

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Nielsen, J.  (2001, November 11). Beyond accessibility: Treating users with disabilities as people. Alertbox, 1, 1-4. Retrieved April 10, 2004, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20011111.html

Nielsen, J., & Molich, R.  (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In J. C. Chew, & J. Whiteside (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People (1st ed., pp. 249-256). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Norrix, L., Plante, E., & Vance, R. (2006). Auditory-visual speech integration by adults with and without language-learning disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 22-36.

Paddison, C., & Englefield, P.  (2003). Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. In M. Zajicek, & A. Edwards (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (1st ed., pp. 126-133). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Paymans, T. F., Lindenberg, J., & Neerincx, M.  (2004). Usability trade-offs for adaptive user interfaces: Ease of use and learnability. In J. Vanderdonckt, N. J. Nunes, & C. Rich (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface (1st ed., pp. 301-303). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H.  (2002). Interactive Design (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

Poldrack, R., & Sandak, R.. (2004). Introduction to this special issue: The cognitive neuroscience of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading,8(3), 199-202.

Price, C., Winterburn, D., Giraud, A., Moore, C., & Noppeney, U. (2003). Cortical localization of the visual and auditory word form areas: A reconsideration of the evidence. Brain and Lanuage,86, 272-286.

Public Law 100-407. (1988, August). The US technology-related assistance for individuals with disabilities act of 1988, Section 3.1 (renewed in 1998 in the Clinton Assistive Technology Act). Washington, D.C: U.S. Printing Office.

Putman, M.  (2005). Computer-based reading technology in the classroom: The affective influence of performance contingent point accumulation on 4^th grade students. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(1), 19-38.

Rasinski, T.  (2001). Reading fluency instruction; Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 704-706.

Rasinski, T. V. (2003). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, 1, 1-16. Retrieved July, 18, 2006, www.prel.org/programs/rel/rel.asp.

Redish, J., Molich, R., Bias, R. G., Dumas, J., Bailey, R., & Spool, J. M. (2002). Usability in practice: Formative usability evaluations - evolution and revolution. In L. Terveen, & D. Wixon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1st ed., pp. 885-890). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Richards, T. L., Dager, S. R., Corina, D., & Serafini, S. (1999, September). Dyslexic children have abnormal brain lactate response to reading-related language tasks. American Journal of Neuroadiology, 20(1), 1393-1398.

Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000, July/August/September). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.

Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003, April). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 6(2), 36-41.

Saariluoma, P., & Kalakoski, V. (1997, Summer). Skilled imagery and long-term working memory. American Journal of Psychology, 110(2), 177-202.

Sadato, N. Pascual-Leone, A. Grafman, J. Ibanez, V. Deiber, M. Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996, April 11). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380(6574), 526-528.

Sandak, R., Mencl, E., Frost, S., & Pugh, K. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent finding and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 273-292.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J.  (2002, Third Quarter). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1st, 213-219.

San Joaquin Delta College. (2006a) Screen Reader Application – Section A, Department (SP Ed 087A). Stockton, California: San Joaquin Delta College, Department of Special Education.

San Joaquin Delta College. (2006b) Screen Reader Application – Section B, Department (SP Ed 087B). Stockton, California: San Joaquin Delta College, Department of Special Education.

Sax, C. L. (2002). Assistive technology on-line instruction: Expanding the dimensions of learning communities. In M. J. Scherer (Ed.), Living in the state of stuck (1st ed.) (pp. 215–229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Scherer, M.  (2004, March). The revised and improved matching person & technology assessment process and forms. Paper presented at the 20th Annual International Conference “Technology and persons with Disabilities", California State University Northridge (CSUN), 1st. Retrieved April 10, 2004, http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/18.htm

Scherer, M., & Parette, P.  (2004, March). Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Paper presented at the 20th Annual International Conference "Technology and Persons with Disabilities", California State University Northridge, 1st. Retrieved March 10, 2004, http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/17.htm

Scherer, M. J. (2003). Connecting to Learn: Educational and Assistive Technology for People With Disabilities (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Seelman, K.  (2003). Trends in rehabilitation and disability: Transition from a medical model to an integrative model. Disability World, 1, 1-21. Retrieved April 14, 2004, http://www.disabilityworld.org/cgi-bin/pfp.cgi?doc=self&top=self&bottomm-self

Seelman, K. D. (2001, January-February). Technologies for successful aging: Policy challenges and synthesis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(1), 65-67.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (3^rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D.  (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 605-620). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Slatin, J., M., & Rush, S.  (2003). Maximum Accessibility (1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

Smith, M.  (2005). Literacy and Augmentative and Alternative Communication (1st ed.). London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Tabachneck (-Schijf), H. J. M. (2005). Supporting collective information processing  in a Web-based environment. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 145-155). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Tardieu, H. & Glyselinck, M. (2003). Working memory constraints in the integration and comprehension of information in a multimedia context. In H. van Oostendorp (Ed.), Cognition in a Digital World (1st ed., pp. 3-24). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Traulsen, J. M., Almarsdóttir, A. B., & Björnsdóttir, I.  (2004, May). Interviewing the moderator: An ancillary method to focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 14(5), 714-725.

van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.  (1999). Incrementality in discourse understanding. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (1st ed., pp. 3-28). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

van Oostendorp, H., Breure, L., & Dillon, A. (2005). Introduction to creation, use and development of digital information. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 1-7). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

van Oostendorp, H., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.). (1999). The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

van Ossenbruggen, J., & Hardman, L. (2005). From syntactic- toward semantic-driven document transformations. In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, Use, and Deployment of Digital Information (1st ed., pp. 55-72). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Vanderheiden, G.  (2000). Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability. In J. Thomas, & J. Scholtz (Eds.), Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability  (1st ed., pp. 32-38). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Vaughn, S., & Edmonds, M. (2006, January). Reading comprehension for older readers. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41(3), 131-138.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wadsworth, S., DeFries, J., & Olson, R. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(1), 75-91.

Walth, J., & Wattenberg, T. L. (2004a, March). Tactile graphics supporting audio information depicting visual representations of Windows screens. Paper presented at the 20th Annual International Conference "Technology and Persons with Disabilities", California State University Northridge (CSUN). Retrieved March 17, http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/61.htm

Walth, J., & Wattenberg, T. L. (2004b, October). Tactile graphics supporting audio information depicting visual representations of Internet Explorer. In T. Stark (Eds.), Paper presented at the 29th Annual California Association for Post-Secondary Education and Disabilities (CAPED) Convention "Surfing the Possibilities: Breaking Through Barriers"(831-01, M7). Spring Valley, CA: All Star Media.

Wattenberg, T. L. (2004a, March). AT&T natural voices used with screen readers for students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the 20th Annual International Conference "Technology and Persons with Disabilities", California State University Northridge (CSUN). Retrieved March 17, 2004, http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2004/proceedings/21.htm

Wattenberg, T. L. (2004b). Beyond legal compliance: Communities of advocacy that support accessible online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 123-139.

Wattenberg, T. L. (2004c, June). Beyond standards: Reading usability goals through user participation. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 79(1), 10-20.

Wattenberg, T. L. (2004d, October). Defining user outcomes for students using screen readers. Paper presented at the 2004 California Association for Postsecondary Education and Disability Conference, Monterey, California. Retrieved July, 2006 http://www.wattenberg.org/presentationCAPEDScreeRreading/PresentationCAPED2004-TexToSpeech.ppt

Wattenberg, T. L. (2005a, October). Accessibility heuristics utilizing learnability characteristics of synthesized speech applications. In A. Sears, & J. E. Pontelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (1st ed., pp. 1-3). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Wattenberg, T. L. (2005b, October). Online focus groups used as an accessible participatory research method. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 84(1), 45-47.

Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G., & De Witte, L. (2003). Non-use of provided assistive technology devices. Technology and Disability, 15(4), 231-238.

Whitney, L. (2005, Fall). Middle level teachers using focus group research. Education, 126(1), 3-9.

Williams, J. R. (2004). Developing Performance Support for Computer Systems: A Strategy for Maximizing Usability and Learnability (1st ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Woodring,J., Foley, S., Rado, G., Brown, K., & Hamner, D.  (2006). Focus groups and methodological reflections. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 248-258.

Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T.  (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211-239.

Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., & Goble, C. (2003, May). A foundation for tool based mobility support for visually impaired Web users. In G. Hencsey & B. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on World Wide Web (1^st ed., pp. 422-430). New York, NY:  ACM Press.

Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., & Goble, C. (2004, May). DANTE: Annotation and transformation of Web pages for visually impaired users. In S. Feldman & M. Uretsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on World Wide Web on Alternate Track Papers and Posters (1^st ed., pp. 490-491). New York, NY:  ACM Press.